The automatic white balance system copes very well to produce accurate colours under a range of different lighting conditions, without erring towards yellowish or warm tones. Well ... I have had the x100 ltd ed ....and lived with its joys and frustrations. Now selling after buying the X100f I’m not a strobist, so haven’t pushed this aspect of the camera, but I can tell you there are some restrictions: Fujifilm quotes 1/2000 as the actual fastest shutter you can sync with, or 1/1000 if you’re using the maximum aperture of f2. As far as I understand, the hotshoe and internal flash are also disabled for the electronic shutter, ruling-out even faster flash syncs up to 1/32000. But even with the caveats, 1/1000 at any aperture is still a lot faster than the 1/180 or 1/250 of most focal plane cameras. It’s also worth mentioning the X100F manages to squeeze-in a small flash for basic work, whereas the XT2 doesn’t have one built-in at all, instead relying on accessories that mount on its hotshoe. FLASH MODE TTL(FLASH AUTO / STANDARD / SLOW SYNC.) / MANUAL / COMMANDER / OFF SYNC. MODE 1ST CURTAIN / 2ND CURTAIN Judging from some responses I am seeing for Sony A9 camera review, I guess my ask (comparing these two cameras) is a very dangerous one. Either brand' die-hard (Fuji or Sony) fan will perhaps lynch you for saying anything not-so-positive about their respective brand.

It’s July 2023 and I just got one of these. Low shutter count. No manual but it’s a very intuitive menu. Being a videographer also helps as I negotiate many menus on many models.

There are 9 ISO settings available on the Fujifilm X100F for JPEGs and RAW files. Here are some 100% crops which show the noise levels for each ISO setting for both JPEG and RAW files. JPEG Also, name one Pentax lens that even comes close to: xf 16/1.4, 23/1.4, 18/2, 35/1.4, 60/2.4 for instance. That's right, none. If you are simply comparing 23/2 on a 12 mp camera vs 35/2.4 on a 16 mp one, well it might be closer. Except build quality feel, close focus, overall portability amd whatnot. As a long time Fuji user I respect the new 24 MÜ sensor in al ist any way. It's impressive and faster.. ales I can't shake the feeling that somehow color rendition is slightly off compared to what one expected of the previous generation in some situations. I can't reproduce it as yet.. The X100F’s lens isn’t optically stabilized and neither does the camera shift its sensor to counteract the wobbles. So you’ll need to find out what sort of speeds you can reliably handhold and keep an eye on the shutter speed, or set a minimum for Auto ISO. On the upside, the leaf shutter introduces much fewer vibrations than a focal plane shutter, so you should be able to handhold at slower speeds than normal. But it does serve as a reminder that interchangeable lens cameras normally have the option to fit optically-stabilised lenses if necessary, and Olympus, Panasonic and Sony systems all now offer bodies with sensor-shift stabilisation that works with any lens you attach. Hmm. My modded Nikon S33 now takes vastly improved macro photos. I created a lens hood from an old telescope piece, then fitted the end with a ND4x filter. Huge jump in quality!

I wrote about this function in my X70 review and it’s basically the same. I would love for Fujifilm to implement this in RAW files as well, so you get a predefined 16MP 50mm eq crop and 12 mp 75mm eq crop when you load your RAW files (just like the Leica Q does)The X100 series has been the result of an iterative process of continuous development. This has prompted a thousand internet wags to snipe that 'I'd rather wait until they make a finished camera.' But, other than the original model running initial firmware, which fell heavily on the wrong end of the endearing/unusable end of the 'quirk' spectrum, each model has been an excellent camera in its own right. This taught me to see how a 50mm sees on every subject. I now spend a lot of time with every new lens as I find I get a lot more out of a system with this approach.

mode Single AF / Continuous AF / MF type Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF), AF assist illuminator available AF frame selection Single point AF: EVF / LCD / OVF: 13x7 / 25x13 (Changeable size of AF frame among 5 types), I suspect some areas of the frame look soft in the studio comparison due to moustache-shaped field curvature, so it would indeed look better in the real world. That being said, I had the X100S for a while, and the lens clearly had some quite severe limitations at 16MP... I had the battery run out on my a6300 -once in 2 years. I popped in a spare in 10 seconds. How is this a problem? Soon Fujifilm will launch a new set of conversion lenses: he Fujifilm WCL-X100 II and the Fujifilm TCL-X100 II. Optically these conversion lenses are not too different from the mark 1 versions, but they differ by one cool feature – the camera can now detect if you attach either of them, and add correction to the files accordingly. The old versions still fit perfectly, but you have to enable the corrections in the menu as before. As we’ve come to expect from Fujifilm cameras, JPEG images directly from the X100F are beautiful. The colour rendition from the “standard” film simulation displays a nice level of saturation and detail, but switching to different film simulation modes is a great idea to match the subject. Everybody will likely have their own favourites, but I personally really enjoy the classic chrome simulation, while the new ACROS simulation is lovely for pleasing monochrome images.The X100F's lens seems to exhibit some curvature of field at relatively close focus distances. The lens is sharper in most use cases than our flat target suggests. Toy camera / Miniature / Pop color / High-key / Low-key / Dynamic tone / Soft focus / Partial color (Red / Orange / Yellow / Green / Blue / Purple)