Yeah, I agree that 4k can be considered any resolution with around 4,000 horizontal pixels, but only as a colloquialism. How about when 8k starts to come around? You only touch base on it. It comes out to be 7680x4320, no one is going to call that 7.5k, they're going to call it 8k. Unless you want to avoid that, you have to accept that "True 4k" really does mean 4096x2160. I don't know who the hell says consumer TVs aren't real 4k, those people are just dumb. You shall make sure that the contents of works uploaded do not violate laws and regulations, contain no illegal or harmful factors of violent, pornographic and reactionary nature, or infringe any legal right of any third party.

and at least ONE of these two resolutions is always supported by a game (except maybe for the really, REALLY old stuff from the DOS or early W95 era) Running regularly will improve the health of your heart and lungs. It can also help you lose weight, especially if combined with a healthy diet. The QHD also has an aspect ratio of 16:9 which is considered wide and hence some manufacturers choose to put the “W” in front of it to indicate it is WIDE, making it the “WQHD”. 2160p / UHD x 1440 pixels is the QuadHD resolution. 1440p resolution contains 2 times the pixels of the “HD” resolution (which is 4 million pixels) and hence the name “QuadHD”. All of the above-mentioned names refer to the same screen resolution. a b Swinson, Peter R (November 2005). "DCI and OTHER Film Formats" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03 . Retrieved 2015-04-02.I guess what I’m saying is that this chart is nice but it’s also kind of divorced from some best practices that could save a lot of time and aggravation over the course of a project. Also—as other folks have said—there are a lot of aspect ratios included here that I can’t imagine working with, but I will definitely concede that aspect ratio is more of a creative decision. Still, I can’t imagine working in 2.35, 2.37, 2.40, or 2.44 when 2.39:1 is the cinematic standard and yields functionally the same frame as those other aspect ratios. Reply A third option (and probably the best option for most people) would be to not mix "K" and "ultrawide" together at all. Just use the old "vertical pixel count" convention and call it "2160p ultrawide". You shall guarantee that the performance of this agreement will neither infringe the rights and interests of any third party, including without limitation to the right of reputation and the portrait right, nor go against any agreement signed between you and a third party to invoke any claim by such third party; you shall guarantee that the performance of this Agreement by HUION will not infringe the legal rights and interests of any third party. In case of any dispute arising from your breach of this Agreement, you shall take the responsibility of settling it, including stepping forward to handle the complaints forwarded by HUION. First things first: when you unbox the Kamvas Pro 16 (2.5K) you’ll find a little adventure in three layers. Sometimes QHD or WQHD is referred to as 2K, with the idea that it’s half the 4K HD resolution found on high-end TV sets (more about that later). But most of the time the 2K name is derived from the larger of the pixel measurements being over 2,000 pixels. Technically, the resolution standard for 2K is 2,048 × 1,080, meaning QHD is actually much better in resolution. QHD could even be referred to as 2.5K, but some people resist in calling these displays 2K. qHD

Here’s a cheat sheet for display resolutions, if you do not want to get into the technicalities: Resolution Unfortunately this is really a misuse of the term "4K". Remember that 4K isn’t a name for a specific resolution like 3840×2160, so "4K ultrawide" doesn’t mean "that resolution, but wider". The "K" term refers to the width in pixels, so "something wider than 4K" would be called 5K. Saying "4K ultrawide" is like asking for an extra-wide 4-meter-wide table or something like that. "You mean...a 5-meter-wide table?" "No, a 4 meter table, but extra wide! Like maybe 5 meters in width!" "...Right..." Q: "Why are we suddenly using horizontal pixels anyway, vertical makes much more sense! The "4K" name is just marketing gibberish created by TV companies!"In addition, an actual 8K resolution such as 8K UHD (7680×4320) is equivalent to four 4K UHD screens. A single 4K UHD screen is four times as many pixels as 1080p, so four of those together is sixteen times as many pixels as 1080p. But 7680×4320 isn't called "16K", it’s called "8K", because it’s approximately 8,000 pixels horizontally. Again it doesn't have anything to do with "how many times 1080p" the resolution is.