There are only 25 to be made, at the end of which the votes are counted up according to the American electoral system, with whoever wins enough Electoral Votes becoming president. (Nobody getting over the line is a different story entirely.) Sven: I wrote the original lineup of questions for this mod in a night a year ago. I assumed that this mod would eventually die like so many other projects of mine, through a mixture of confusion and distractedness on my part. I never got a code to work, no matter what I did. Verbluffen came in, and not only tightened up my EXTREMELY long script to something that kept to a brisk clip, but found maybe the fastest and finest programmer we could have asked for in Astro. My life outside of Reddit continues to be truly bonkers, but I am proud of this Mod, and I assure you all the rest of the scenario will follow in good time. I am extremely proud of what we have done, and am even more excited to show what else we have in the chamber. Do Well, But Not Perfect: "Winning" in 1498 Florence is dictated by how much of the popular vote (representing Florentine support) Savonarola wins. That being said, winning 52% or lower and 58% or higher of the popular vote mostly results in objectively worse endings for Savonarola and Florence.

Wallace new colors: https://www.reddit.com/r/thecampaigntrail/comments/ozi6so/more_accurate_colors_wallace_68/ Step 4: Paste all of THIS CODE (I had to move from pastebin to gitlab because pastebins shitty filter was detecting my code as offensive) into your console and hit enter. Now you'll be able to select 1964 and 1796 in your scenario screen, select 1796.

George Wallace can pull off a variation of this in multiple mods, usually tanking his campaign, but in the 1972 mod where he wins the primary, Wallace can totally condemn his old stances on race and go on to defeat Nixon in a massive upset, even being described in the ending as "the left's tentative champion".

You Bastard!: Choosing a particularly divisive running mate as VP in the 2024G mod, then claiming that the reason you did that was to get her supporters to the polls, earns you the following response: "No, you chose her because you thought it would be funny to self-sabotage [your candidate], the person behind the screen reading this." In the 1924b scenario which follows from the 1916 scenario, James Reed, the Democratic nominee, is brutally far behind popular incumbent Leonard Wood. The intended only way to win is to organize a meeting with Henry Ford, who will then get Reed in touch with Joseph Goebbels himself, allowing Reed to use the Nazi propaganda machine to drag Wood down enough to steal a victory, with the end screen even saying Reed plans to do Hitler's bidding in America. This suggests a rather grim outcome for the future of the United States.

History will not remember you kindly as it will be likely that you will end up lumped in with Benedict Arnold and other traitors of America's past, perhaps in the future someone will uncover Roosevelt's outsized role in this operation and salvage your legacy. However, in the present, the Democratic Party will spend much time distancing itself from you and denouncing your corruption. The road ahead looks bleak, but at least you tried your best. It appears Icarus flew too close to the sun." Undying Loyalty: It is noted that certain Vice-Presidential candidates like Walter Mondale, Bob Dole and Howard Baker are good, reliable party men - important in a world where political figures can end up at ends with one coming off second best, such as Humphrey's choice to split from the Johnson administration, or candidate Charles Evans Hughes having to contest former President Theodore Roosevelt's talking points.