PMS International Cow Kiddee Case - Kids Travel Case

Product Information

Comapring the respective shapes alone, and ignoring the markings on the side and the eyes at the front, he found that there had been infringement. With over 500 lawyers we would expect to be able to provide the specialist skill and experience that you need. Lord Neuberger, in analysing the appellate judgment, has in fact identified three criticisms made by the Court of Appeal.

The case concerned a Community registered design (CRD) for the well-known Trunki ride-on childrens' suitcase. Paul Beverly, who is the director of PMS, has openly stated that he came up with the concept of the Kiddee Case as a result of having seen a Trunki. The surface decoration given to many objects could either reinforce or dilute the impression of the unadorned shape.In particular, it is expected to provide clarification on whether the colour contrasts shown in the CRD’s computer-aided drawings do in fact operate to limit the design to a particular style of surface decoration.

The good news (for new applicants) is that (coincidentally) the designs registry is proposing to change its fee structure so that "multiple" design applications (i. It is a conclusion I would have reached with some regret, as the conception of the Trunki, a ride-on wheeled case which looks like an animal, seems to have been both original and clever; as Arnold J said at para 16 of his judgment, “[t]here is no dispute that the Trunki was an innovative design” and it “has won numerous awards and has been a significant commercial success.found that the correspondences between the two artworks were insufficient to amount to a reproduction of a substantial part of the Trunki artwork, although the Defendant was found to have infringed the Claimant's copyright in the Trunk safety notice.