CAMRY Digital Hand Dynamometer Grip Strength Measurement Meter Auto Capturing Electronic Hand Grip Power 198 Lbs / 90 Kgs

Product Information

The medical applications are also very important-getting a sense of hand strength is crucial for the study of medical complaints involving the hand as well as muscle loss that causes decrease in strength. Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):300–7.

In our secondary analysis, we found an homogenic decline of hand grip strength with age and a difference between women and men, with greater hand grip values for men, which is consistent with previous evidence (Mancilla et al. 2016; Dodds et al. 2016). Bohannon R, Schaubert K. Test–retest reliability of grip-strength measures obtained over a 12-week interval from community-dwelling elders. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:426–8. The average handgrip strength (HGS) values at six times by the Jamar and CAMRY devices were 25.0 ± 7.9 kg and 24.6 ± 7.5 kg, respectively. The ICC values between the two devices were 0.815–0.854, and the systematic bias underestimated by the CAMRY dynamometer was 0.5 kg in men and 0.6 kg in women. We carried out a linear regression equation by sex, and their relationship was found as follows: male HGS (kg) Jamar = 8.001 + 0.765 × HGS (kg) CAMRY; female HGS (kg) Jamar = 3.681 + 0.840 × HGS (kg) CAMRY. Conclusions

Testing Extra

Most studies in this field have reported numerous types of hand dynamometers to measure grip strength in addition to Jamar, such as the DynEX, Grip-ball, Smedley, and other measurement devices. Kim et al. [ 8] reported evidence between the Jamar and Smedley dynamometers in 2017; 478 participants attended the study. There was systematic bias with underestimating HGS by the Smedley dynamometer compared with Jamar, bias 3.09 kg for men and bias 2.6 kg for women. Shechtman et al. [ 7] reported the reliability and validity of the digital DynEx Dynamometer in 2005. This study selected the Jamar criterion as the gold standard, and 100 young, healthy subjects aged 20–40 years were included; the data revealed high test–retest reliability for the DynEx Dynamometer ( r = 0.9864) [ 7]. According to the present results, the sample size for the DynEx dynamometer is so small that more evidence is needed to support this conclusion. A grip-ball dynamometer can be used for home self-monitoring HGS because of a pressure sensor. Vermeulen et al. [ 26] reported that the Pearson correlations between grip ball and the Jamar dynamometer were 0.71 and 0.76 for the left and right hands, respectively. Indeed, the use of grip-ball dynamometers in our country is rare; on the other hand, the implementation of grip-ball as a screening and monitoring HGS device is uncertain. Watanabe T, Owashi K, Kanauchi Y, Mura N, Takahara M, Ogino T. The short-term reliability of grip strength measurement and the effects of posture and grip span. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(3):603–9.

Boissy, P., Bourbonnais, D., et al. (1999). "Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function." Clin Rehabil 13(4): 354-362. Find it on PubMed Sousa-Santos A R & Amaral T F. (2017). Differences in handgrip strength protocols to identify sarcopenia and frailty-a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):1–21.Chen CH, Ho-Chang, Huan YZ, Hung TT. Hand-grip strength is a simple and effective outcome predictor in esophageal cancer following esophagectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:1–5. variations: The position of the arm and hand can vary in different grip strength protocols. Various positions include the elbow being held at right angles as per the above procedure, the arm hanging by the side, and the extended arm being swung from above the head to by the side during the squeezing motion. The Eurofit Test Manual recommends squeezing for 3 seconds. The procedure for the Groningen Elderly Tests has the subject hang their hand by their side, one practice trial, best of three attempts with 30 seconds rest between. Clerke (2005) [2] conducted a study which examined the impact of the shape of the hand (as relatively long, average, or square-shaped) on maximal voluntary isometric grip strength in a group of healthy male and female teenagers aged 13 to 17 years.

After the measurement has been taken read the value displayed on the dynamometer and record it then turn the pulley to set the indicator to zero and repeat the measurement once again. Frailty and loss of function and health are also associated with sarcopenia, a geriatric syndrome characterized by loss of muscle and strength [ 15]. Globally, the prevalence of sarcopenia among adults aged 60 years and over is estimated to be at least 10% [ 16]. Sarcopenia not only predicts mortality among community-dwelling and acutely ill older adults [ 17– 19], but is also related to functional decline, loss of independence, and hospitalization [ 20– 22]. Exercise interventions can successfully prevent and reverse muscle loss and functional decline [ 23, 24], but clinical assessment is needed to identify older adults who are at risk [ 16]. Savino E, Martini E, Lauretani F, Pioli G, Zagatti AM, Frondini C, et al. Handgrip strength predicts persistent walking recovery after hip fracture surgery. The American journal of medicine. 2013;126(12):1068-75. How good is your grip? It’s not just a convincing handshake – or your ability to twist the lid off the jam – that’s at stake, if yours is feeble. “Good grip is integral to so many sports,” says Gareth Cole, head of performance at Coach London. “Whenever you need to hold on to an object, apply force to an object, pull yourself towards something or pull something towards yourself, you are recruiting the muscles in the forearm and hand that facilitate grip. Poor grip can also be the weakest link when you are lifting heavy weights.” The mean difference of the measurements of both instruments was evaluated. For correlations, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used. Correlations were considered low ( r< 0.2), moderate ( r = 0.2–0.5), or high ( r> 0.5) according to the recommendations of Cohen ( 1988). Concordance was assessed by Lin’s concordance coefficient correlation, and Bland–Altman plot for visualization of study results was composed (Bland & Altman 1986).Duan YJ. Advance in hand grip measurement(review). Chin J Rehab Theory Pract. 2009;15(10):948–951. (In Chinese). Although ASHT recommends using Jamar, Smedley type (e.g., Baseline and Takei, etc.) is commonly used in Asia. Ha et al. [ 32] describe the methods used for measuring HGS in epidemiologic studies of sarcopenia in Asia. In terms of dynamometer choice, Smedley type is used in 13 studies, and Jamar and its variants are used in 9 studies.[ 32] Especially, the Smedley type is used in most Japanese population studies.[ 33] The position of the forearm and wrist has been known to affect the HGS. Pryce [ 44] analyzed the influence of wrist position on HGS, suggesting that ulnar deviation of 0 to 15 degrees and extension posture of 0 to 15 degrees could provide the strongest grip. O'Driscoll and his colleagues [ 45] showed that the subjects had the strongest HGS at a slight ulnar deviation and 33 to 40 degrees extension of the wrist when they let subjects choose the optimal position to generate the most powerful HGS.