Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
The image grew ubiquitous to the point where reinterpretations of it began spreading on Tumblr as well. For example, user TGGeko posted a drawing of a realistic cat with the phrase (shown below, left). User Fuliajulia created an edit in which the text was replaced with Bode (shown below, right). This sadly isn't restricted to personal lives, but also to professional lives. As in denying services or venues to people of a specific nationality and/or for voicing an opinion that is contrary to the authorized ideology and/or opinion And it'll probably get worse lol; even with the last few years bringing about even greater craziness in what you can and can't say How PAW Patrol will come to be viewed in years to come is an interesting question: it seems likely that a generation of children coming-of-age in a time of far greater gender fluidity than ever, will have little time for the show’s patriarchal gender performance. In other words, abandoning their children to this ceaselessly cheery neoliberal nightmare for 90 minutes shouldn’t worry parents too much.
No, you are not being "extremely cautious," you ignore everything due to the so-called bias and cannot even fathom that your own sources are even more biased. PAW Patrol’s chief singularity is the way young people are called upon to rectify the mistakes or crimes of adults. Ryder, Charlie to the pooches’ Angels, is a 10-year-old vigilante, and in the new film has become a magnate at the head of a lucrative empire. The animals themselves, the movie reminds us, are conspicuously not dogs but puppies – never ageing, like Bart Simpson or Just William. This is important, because it aligns with a sensibility in which youth, unclouded by ambition or other adult considerations, is able to save the day over and over. Perhaps this is pleasing or recognisable to children brought up by late millennials having to become adults in a world where traditional markers of ageing (such as house ownership) are shifting. Also, children raised post- Philippa Perry are probably used to being considered on a more equal footing to grownups than previous generations.And on your point about how people react to things when they are told to/told to feel things. Instead of doing it before. I completely agree. Russia's invasion of Ukraine is a perfect example. What's going on there is terrible, and people should be outraged and feel something. I'm not saying this applies to everyone, but for people who feel nothing when there's atrocities committed in the Middle East by the US and Israel. But now feel something; it's only because they're told to feel outraged. And relationships that depend too much on which side you support or even just not support enough are quite fragile. Now the scary part is when enough people follow a specific narrative where it starts to become "okay" to not treat people based on their ethnicity or medical choice Too much in recent years we've seen a cheering on of censorship, even if it's under a justification of censoring information that's wrong, it isn't right to do that. And it's not even about censoring information that's wrong to begin with, it's about censoring information that's critical and damaging. Yes, that's what the Red Scare was all about From one to the next and totally obliviously at that, aren't you just adorable? Because given how bad the profit incentives of sensationalism present in conventional media is, state-funded and state-managed must clearly be superior.Oh well: I see culture as the total of lived experience of a community—where the boundary of that community is drawn and what the political implication of that may be is the big question. A culture can be as large as the entire population of the world or as small as two people (say twins with a secret language).Any smaller than two and you have a survivor of a culture, rather than a culture.Nations have historically looked to distinctive aspects of their culture as elements of their identity.For Danes, say, this means big things like language, social mores and residence in a particular location as well as small things like having a hole in their coins. The interface betweenpropagandaand culture then is often thatpropagandainvokes culture as something to be protected.More than this some countries have seen culture as being one of their assets and have sought to introduce their culture to others as a way of increasing their “soft power” in the world.Once something is claimed as characteristic of national identity it then becomes an issue to be defended so culture andpropagandacan be a self-reinforcing loop. 4. What effect doespropagandahave on people?
Yes but there have been so many atrocities and bad things happening that makes one feel indifferent about those, which is a form of self-protection With freedom, It depends how we look at it from what perspective. We talking about, certain aspects of society or the whole thing altogether I am immune to propaganda, for I know that western MSM has said a lot of lies to push their neoliberal narrative. Yeah, but quite some expect others to feel the same as them themselves. One of the major conflict potentials in human interactions is precisely when one side doesn't feel as much about the other person or about a specific matter as the other one I believe that an effective propagandist does not teach his or her audience something new, but rather tells them something they have always thought and connects it to a political action in a new way. Because you know/believe X you should vote for Y or shoot Z. This means that propagandacan sometimes be reassuring as it affirms existing ideas.Of course sometimes that idea is a negative, as withpropagandato encourage and enemy soldier to surrender because “defeat is inevitable.”That might include a reassuring element: “surrender and you will be well-treated; your enemy is asking you to surrender because he respects the brave way in which you have fought.”I see some of the most perniciouspropagandaas that which plays to the audience's sense of themself as a victim with a unique need to be compensated by the rest of the world.That is at the heart of the current wave of nationalistpropagandaaround the world.Even victors like the citizens of theUnited States are encouraged to think of themselves as losers whose way of life is endangered and must be defended from outsiders who seek to supplant them. 5. Do you believe that mostpropagandahas a negative intent?
The film’s dismaying gender politics are in tune with the franchise’s gross rightwingery, which sees these privatised dog-Avenger types endlessly called upon to undo the failings of various functionaries. A sort of Ayn Randian objectivism prevails in the film, visible most queasily when Chase (the most cop-like of the lot, in his blue uniform and police car) is told that he was “born to be a hero”. The film draws amusing parallels between the pups’ antagonist, Mayor Humdinger, and another blond North American megalomaniac, right down to the grotesque tower that Trump – I mean, Humdinger – erects in his own honour. But the film’s own sensibility is not vastly different to Trumpian individualism, disdain for the state, and capitalist materialism – indeed, in the film the dogs have a new tower of their own, subsidised by selling merch, and come with gleaming luxury gadgets that make Liberty, the poorer dog, swoon with envy.
I've got my principles written down to avoid straying. I'm not immune, and I try to be aware of it. I try to look at the bigger picture and observe from different perspectives when possible. So much of our world was shaped bypropagandain one way or another. I am especially interested in the successful British campaign to bring Americans into World War II in the run-up to Pearl Harbor.That was the subject of my first book, and I remain impressed by the techniques used and the characters who took part.Evidence of effectiveness may be found in the continued admiration of Americans for the man at the heart of the campaign—Winston Churchill—and such elements of it asBBC News(although the skill of the BBC was to achieve theirpropagandaaims through use of credible facts and journalism). 7. How didpropagandainfluence the 20th century? Yup; and we've been doing the Anti-Russian stuff forever since it not only gives us an enemy, but our anti-soviet and communist red scare tactics at the time were used as a means to suppress labor movements. Yes, but it's also in parts because people have seemingly become more sensitive, so that's why we have all the additional rules and the CE board closed
2. Is propaganda as prevalent today as it was during the 1900s?
Yes, the craziness has even increased in the recent years. Especially as a result of guided thinking where people are getting implanted thoughts I am not 100% immune to it, but because I do study in history field I am taught and I am studying on books which are soaked in propaganga from ancient times, middle-ages, napoleonic times, XIX-XXI century, so I do try to avoid propagandas and manipulation and not let them change my mind/view but it is impossible to avoid every single one of them. I am happy to answer your interesting questions.I feel it is an essential thing for the well-being of oursociety that students like yourselfunderstandpropaganda. 1. What interested you inpropagandarather than another subject? Yeah Anti-German sentiments at the time were probably awful, just awful. Here's an example of how much people were overreacting. Kitchener, a city in Canada was originally called Berlin, changed it's name in 1916.
Great Deal 
New Comment